Virtual Summit • 14 November 2026 • Call for Abstracts Open
Home / Call for Papers
Call for Papers

Call for Papers & Abstracts

Submit your original research contributions across six core tracks. Experience our rapid 2–4 working day peer-review process with zero submission fees.

Conference Tracks

Six Pillars of Inquiry

We invite theoretical, empirical, algorithmic, and policy papers addressing the following multidisciplinary tracks.

01

Track 1: AI Ethics & Governance

Focuses on societal implications of artificial intelligence, legal liability of autonomous systems, algorithmic bias quantification, and international regulatory harmonisation.

  • Algorithmic fairness, demographic parity & debiasing
  • Regulatory policy: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, OECD Principles
  • Autonomous decision-making ethics in healthcare and law
  • Human-in-the-loop oversight and escalation models
02

Track 2: Research Integrity in the AI Era

Addresses scientific misconduct, image and figure tampering detection, automated paper mill proliferation, and LLM-induced scientific hallucinations.

  • Forensic detection of AI-generated synthetic figures
  • Auditing automated literature reviews and citation networks
  • Preventing paper-mill infiltration in peer review
  • Institutional integrity frameworks and misconduct governance
03

Track 3: Responsible AI Frameworks

Dedicated to technical interpretability, explainable machine learning (XAI), adversarial red-teaming, safety alignment, and verification of safety-critical algorithms.

  • Feature attribution, SHAP/LIME extensions, and mechanistic XAI
  • Adversarial attack robustness and red-teaming benchmarks
  • Constitutional AI, RLHF calibration & value alignment
  • Certification and safety boundaries for autonomous agents
04

Track 4: Authorship, Attribution & AI Content

Investigates intellectual property, training data provenance, watermarking methodologies, and redefining contributor roles for human-AI collaboration.

  • CRediT taxonomy adaptation for generative AI agents
  • Statistical and cryptographic model watermarking
  • Copyright, fair use, and training set consent architectures
  • Academic integrity policies in university pedagogy
05

Track 5: Peer Review & Reproducibility

Focuses on open science workflows, mandatory code/data artifact evaluation, AI-assisted peer-review integrity, and resolving benchmark reproducibility failures.

  • Artifact evaluation badges and containerized verification
  • AI in peer review: bias detection and review quality audits
  • Benchmark dataset curation and data rot mitigation
  • Preregistration and open science protocols in AI
06

Track 6: Data Privacy & Accountability

Examines privacy-preserving machine learning, differential privacy in generative models, synthetic data validation, and independent algorithmic audits.

  • Differential privacy and secure federated learning
  • Synthetic dataset fidelity vs. privacy leakage risk
  • Model unlearning and machine forgetting techniques
  • Third-party algorithmic auditing standards and protocols
Author Guidelines

Submission Requirements

Abstract Formatting (Initial Stage)

  • Length: 250 to 500 words summarizing background, methodology, results, and integrity implications.
  • Keywords: 4 to 6 relevant keywords reflecting chosen track taxonomy.
  • Language: English (standard academic spelling and grammar).
  • Cost: 100% Free submission and evaluation.

Publication & Indexing Transparency

Abstract submission and conference acceptance do not guarantee publication in a journal, proceedings series, or indexed database. ScholarVault is currently evaluating publication collaborations with academic publishers. Where a publisher arrangement is available, publication will remain subject to the publisher's editorial policies and applicable Article Processing Charges (APCs), where applicable. Where appropriate, conference materials may instead be deposited through an archival repository platform. Any DOI or indexing outcome will depend on the final publication route and the independent policies of the relevant service.

Presentation & Publication Policy

  • Presentation Format: Every accepted submission is designated as a Virtual Research Presentation.
  • Author Certificate: Official digital Certificate of Presentation with verification QR code.
  • Optional Full-Paper: Full-paper publication is not guaranteed. Any publication opportunity will depend on the final publication route, editorial policies and applicable Article Processing Charges (APCs), where applicable.
  • Ethics Declaration: Authors must disclose any LLM tool usage in manuscript drafting.
Quality Commitment

Rapid 2–4 Day Review SLA

ScholarVault values researcher time. Our dedicated Technical Program Committee evaluates abstract submissions on a rolling basis, delivering formal decisions within 2 to 4 working days of receipt.

Review Evaluation Criteria:
• Thematic Alignment
• Methodological Rigor
• Originality & Novelty
• Ethical Soundness
Submit Your Abstract
Frequently Asked Questions

Answers for Researchers

Is abstract submission free?

Yes. Abstract submission and evaluation are currently free.

How long does review take?

The typical academic review window is 2–4 working days.

Does acceptance guarantee publication?

No. Publication, DOI and indexing depend on the final publication route and its policies.